The Vertical Integration of Content and Broadband Services: the Net Neutrality Debate
نویسندگان
چکیده
Whether broadband service providers should be allowed to vertically integrate with content providers is a contentious issue, especially from the net neutrality perspective, since the vertically integrated firm can prioritize the delivery of its own content at the expense of that of its competitors if net neutrality is not enforced. We analyze the issues of vertical integration of content and broadband services surrounding this debate from an economic perspective, using a game-theoretic model. Our analysis establishes the various equilibria in the game, and shows that if net neutrality is not enforced, social welfare might – depending on parameter values – increase or decrease with vertical integration. Interestingly, we find that it is not always true that the ISP will always degrade the delivery of the competing content, and in fact will sometimes have the incentive to prioritize the latter over its own.
منابع مشابه
The Broadband Debate, A User's Guide
INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................69 I. VISIONS OF THE FUTURE ..............................................................71 A. The Openists...........................................................................71 B. The Deregulationists...............................................................75 II. SHARED ECONOMIC FAIT...
متن کاملThe Debate on Net Neutrality: A Policy Perspective
Whether to legislate to maintain " net neutrality " , the current status quo of prohibiting broadband service providers from charging online websites for preferential access to their residential and commercial customers, has become a subject under fierce debate. We develop a stylized game-theoretic model to address two critical issues of the net neutrality: (1) who are gainers and losers of aba...
متن کاملNetwork Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination
Communications regulators over the next decade will spend increasing time on conflicts between the interests of broadband providers and the public’s interest in competitive innovation environment on the internet. As the policy questions this conflict raises are basic to communications policy, they are likely to appear in many different forms. So far, the first major appearance has come in the “...
متن کاملWould Mandating Broadband Network Neutrality Help or Hurt Competition? A Comment on the End-to-End Debate
A chorus of commentators has drawn inspiration from the ‘‘end-toend’’ argument first advanced by Saltzer, Reed, and Clark and called upon policy makers to mandate that last-mile broadband providers adhere to certain principles of network neutrality. In his contribution to this symposium, Professor Christopher Yoo offers an economic critique of these proposals. He first concludes that they are b...
متن کاملAre "Dumb Pipe" Mandates Smart Public Policy? Vertical Integration, Net Neutrality, and the Network Layers Model
Many academics and some public policymakers are increasingly advocating the adoption of regulations mandating ‘‘open’’ or ‘‘dumb’’ broadband networks over ‘‘closed’’ or proprietary systems. While such an ‘‘open-vs.-closed’’ distinction grossly over-simplifies the issue, it would be a mistake for lawmakers to implement regulations choosing network architectures. Such regulatory proposals are bas...
متن کامل